Home » Posts tagged 'Approval process'
Tag Archives: Approval process
Indian Express |Express News Service | Mumbai | October 29, 2014 |
A year after the employees of Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil College at Sion-Chunabhatti complained to the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and Directorate of Technical Education (DTE) regarding the misrepresentation of facts by the college to get courses sanctioned and approved, the Wadala Truck Terminal police registered an FIR on Monday evening, against the principals of two colleges. They also registered cases against the president and general secretary of the college management for cheating, submitting false documents and forgery. According to Mahesh singh Thakur, general secretary of Dharamrajya Kaamgar Karmchari Mahasangh (DKKM) that has been at the forefront of exposing the fraud by the management of the two colleges since past few years said that it is sad that despite the AICTE and DTE being made aware of the fraud, no action was taken against the management. “We have been working to highlight the cheating and fraudulent means by which the college management has flouted AICTE and DTE norms since the past year. Even after a case was made out about the same on the instructions of the court that was hearing our petition, the government did nothing to register a case nor took any action against the management. Our organization had to pursue the matter and finally an FIR has been registered against the college officials and management,” said Thakur.
The FIR has been registered against Dr. KTV Reddy — principal of Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil’s College of Engineering, Ashok Chavan — principal of Manohar Phalke Polytechnic college, trustee of the college Dhanaji Jadhav and secretary of the trust Ashalata Phalke under section 420 (Cheating), 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention), 464 (Making a false document) and 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating) According to the FIR, the college management has misled the authorities into believing that they have fulfilled all criteria for continuation of their existence and affiliation but the fact is that the details of area used for various facilities like library, laboratory, recreation room, and so on is much lesser than the actual. This has been a clear case of misrepresentation of facts and fraud. Last year, the BMC had also carried out demolition of two upper floors of the college as it was declared unauthorised.
The Hindu | New Delhi, October 19, 2014 | |
Authorities like the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), who are in-charge of granting approval, preparing syllabus and imparting education are required to behave with responsibility and not cause any inconvenience to students, the Supreme Court has held. Giving this ruling a Bench of Justices Dipak Misra and U.U. Lalit said, “when an attitude of apathy or lackadaisical propensity or proclivity of procrastination of the statutory authorities creeps in as a consequence of which the time schedule meant for approval of the educational institutions and commencement of the courses is not adhered to, a feeling of devouring darkness seems to reign supreme as if “things fall apart.”
MBAUniverse.com | 15 Oct 2014 |
Hon`ble Supreme Court has today on October 15, 2014 allowed the PGDM institutions to go ahead with their admission process 2015-16.
In a swift turn of events, Hon’ble Supreme Court has today on October 15, 2014 allowed the PGDM institutions to go ahead with their admission process 2015-16. The apex court of India has also allowed the B schools to maintain the pre AICTE notification (2010) status which restricted them on various counts. It is a significant order that would bring about clarity on the PGDM admissions 2015-16 as the 300 private B schools offering PGDM programmes were not able to proceed with their admission process for academic session 2015-16 due to lack of clarity on this issue. The petition was filed in Hon’ble Supreme Court by EPSI, Jaipuria Institute of Management and AIMS regarding staying of the AICTE’s Notification (2010) and restoring the status quo and autonomy of PGDM institutions for the academic year 2015-16. . Hon’ble Supreme Court in its four interim orders earlier had restored the status quo and stayed the AICTE Notification of (2010) for Academic Sessions of 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15. With this order now the B schools may have the sigh of relief to go ahead with their admission process 2015-16 as well.
The tricky case was contended at Supreme Court of India by Mr Abhishek Manu Singhvi a very senior counsel alongwith country’s other leading lawyers, Mr K K Venugopal, Mr Gopal Shankar Narayan and Mr Naresh Kaushik . The case came up before the Supreme Court on October 13, 2014. After a prolonged argument and a lot of convincing arguments, the bench decided not to drop the petition. The Bench however during the hearing had expressed its reservations in extending any further stay in the matter. The combined case of EPSI, Jaipuria Institute of Management and AIMS was scheduled for October 14, 2014 before the same bench and country’s leading lawyers, Mr K K Venugopal, Mr Abhishek Manu Singhvi along with Mr Gopal Shankar Narayan and Mr Naresh Kaushik were present together to represent the case. However, the case could not be taken up by the closing hours and was slated for hearing on Oct 15, 2014. The case came up before the bech today and the apex court on October 15, 2014 has issued the stay order for another one academic year 2015-16. It was expected that Hon’ble Court may not just give another stay order as in previous years but would proceed towards giving a final verdict in the petition. However another year of stay has been allowed now by the apex court restoring the autonomy, conduct of examinations, admissions, fee structure and governance for academic session 2015-16.
Petition of AIMS, EPSI, Jaipuria brings relief from Supreme court to 300 PGDM B-schools | MBAUniverse.com | 16 Oct 2014 | Read More …
The Times of India ||
NEW DELHI: The IIT-UGC row over degrees may take longer than expected to get resolved. The IIT Council has decided to set up a three-member committee to look into the issue. It will consist of HRD secretary Ashok Thakur, UGC chairperson Ved Prakash and scientist Anil Kakodkar. Earlier the HRD ministry was thinking of seeking the law ministry’s opinion but it has been put on hold. One IIT director said, “A non-issue has been allowed to become a serious problem. It could have been resolved through talks earlier. Hope the committee finds a way out.” IITs continue to insist that UGC had no business to write to them to give degrees only approved by the Commission. They claim that IITs are governed by an act of Parliament not the UGC. IITs, one director said, are empowered to “institute courses of study” without UGC’s approval. “UGC is confused about IITs’ autonomy and powers. It is UGC that needs to understand both the acts,” the IIT director said. On its part, UGC says Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 stipulates that IITs can institute courses of study, hold examinations and grant degrees/diplomas and other academic distinctions or titles. UGC says ‘courses of study’ does not mean ‘degrees’ since the two phrases are used at different places in the IT Act, 1961. UGC says provisions of the UGC Act 1956 and IT Act should be understood in a harmonious manner rather than to the exclusion of the other. “It would be more appropriate if IITs list the various degrees which they feel are not in conformity with the list of UGC-specified degrees. The exact mismatch between IIT Kharagpur degrees and the UGC-specified degrees may have to be reviewed jointly and an appropriate solution worked out considering the students’ interests at stake,” UGC says.
The Times of India ||
PUNE: University Grants Commission (UGC) member D N Reddy on Friday ruled out any move to dissolve the commission in favour of some other regulatory body for higher education in the country. “The present (NDA) government is thinking of restructuring the UGC. However, there is no move to scrap the commission,” Reddy said, while responding to the concerns raised by the representatives of open and distance learning (ODL) institutes. Reddy said, “An expert committee assigned by the HRD ministry under a former UGC chairman is currently working on the restructuring plan, which is much required considering the changes the higher education in the country has gone through over the last several years. The number of colleges and universities has gone up rapidly over the years.”
“When the UGC Act was passed in 1956, the number of colleges in the country was 100s but now, we have over 38,000 colleges and 600 universities. The universities are expected to go up to 1,000. As such, restructuring of the commission is needed to address various issues on account of such expansion of higher education,” he said. An expert panel, headed by R P Agrawal, former secretary to HRD ministry, was looking into the amendments to the UGC Act, he added. Last year, the HRD ministry transferred the regulatory functions for ODL universities and institutions to the UGC after the Distance Education Council (DEC), which was performing the regulatory functions as a constituent unit of the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), was dissolved. A set of interim regulations were prepared by the N R Madhava Menon committee and the same are being implemented by the UGC’s Distance Education Board.
Reddy conceded that there is no clarity yet on various regulatory norms for ODL institutes and for offering technical education through distance education board. “The Supreme Court has already said the All India Council for Technical Education has no powers to regulate technical education. The report of the HRD ministry’s Madhava Menon committee on reforms in distance education is to go to the Parliament for approval in the form of an enactment for a new regulatory authority for distance education. We expect a clear picture to emerge by December when the regulatory authority and apt regulations will be in place.” He said, “The reforms committee’s recommendations are excellent from both, the government and the institutes’ point of view but, much would depend on how much the government adopts and translates into the act for the proposed regulatory authority.”
The Hindu | Education Plus | NEW DELHI, September 18, 2014 |
The University Grants Commission (UGC) has asked Vice-Chancellors of all universities to seek approval before undertaking any promotional activity overseas. Failure to do so could attract disciplinary action, the UGC warned. The Commission is a funding authority and also a regulator for higher education. Apart from seeking approval from the Commission and the Union Human Resource Development (HRD) Ministry, Vice-Chancellors have also been told that the local Indian missions be kept in the loop. According to a letter sent out on Wednesday to all Vice-Chancellors, some universities have been found engaging – directly or through agents appointed by them – with citizens of foreign countries to entice them into getting admission in their courses. “The Indian missions abroad are kept in the dark in the entire process of admission. Such activities not only cause great harm to the image of Indian universities and institutions but also potentially pose a threat to national security,’’ the communication pointed out.
The Indian Express |Ruhi Tewari | New Delhi | September 18, 2014
As part of its efforts to introduce one legislation for all central universities, the Human Resource Development Ministry has circulated the draft bill to all such varsities, asking them to revert with suggestions within three weeks. According to minutes of the retreat of vice-chancellors chaired by HRD Minister Smriti Irani in Chandigarh last week, the “Single Act for Central Universities has been circulated to all Central Universities for inviting their suggestions.” The draft bill is based on recommendations of the A M Pathan committee and has been criticised for compromising the autonomy of these universities. There are currently 40 central universities under the Ministry, of which 16 were created in 2009 under one Act, while the rest are governed by separate Acts of Parliament. “No consensus has been evolved on the issue even though its clear the Ministry is keen on it. But yes, questions of autonomy and protecting the distinct character of each university cannot be ignored,” a V-C, who attended the retreat, said.
Officials said the idea behind a single legislation is to bring in “greater uniformity” in terms of structure and governance, even while retaining the universities’ academic autonomy. To “expedite the process” of appointments and ensure that the selection process is not upheld due to the unavailability of one nominee, the Ministry has decided to propose five names as Visitor’s nominees for selection committees, as against the one it proposes now. “There was a common consensus that MHRD will propose a panel of five names as Visitor’s nominees for the Selection Committees of each university across the disciplines of academic as well as non-academic positions separately,” the minutes state. “The idea is that if one member is not available then the next one on the panel can step in and the process doesn’t get held up,” an official said. The Ministry has also directed the V-Cs to form a committee to prepare a proposal to convert posts of professor and associate professor to assistant professor. The committee will have to prepare a report and submit it to UGC in a month’s time. Officials said the idea behind the proposal is to give greater flexibility in appointments by re-appropriating positions within the cadre. The availability of a large number of candidates for posts of assistant professor has also prompted this move. If the norm is implemented, a university would be free to appoint an assistant professor in place of a professor/associate professor if it is unable to get applicants for the latter. Universities have also been asked to send all MoUs signed by them in the last 20-25 years to the Ministry within one month.
Business Standard | Press Trust of India | New Delhi |September 15, 2014
The Delhi High Court today upheld a decision by AICTE to place a city-based engineering college under “withdrawal of approval status” for the academic year 2014-15 on grounds including lack of own permanent building. “It is apparent that the petitioner-institute suffers from several deficiencies pointed out by the Expert Visiting Committee. Despite various notices issued by AICTE to it to shift to a permanent site, it has been conducting engineering course from temporary premises for more than 15 years. “While it is true that the time to shift premises has been extended till December 31, 2014, yet this court finds that no steps have been taken by petitioners for shifting their college to a permanent site. After all a building cannot be constructed overnight,” a bench of Justice Manmohan said. It upheld the All India Council for Technical Education’s order of June 24 by which Delhi-based Guru Premsukh Memorial College Engineering was put under the category of “withdrawal of approval status” for the academic year 2014-15. AICTE had also requested the Principal Secretary (Higher and Technical Education) Delhi and the Registrar of GGSIP University to shift affected students of other AICTE-approved institutes in consultation with the Delhi government. “…This court is of the view that the impugned order dated 24th June, 2014 suffers from no illegality, irregularity and/or procedural impropriety…,” the court said while dismissing the plea of the engineering college. The college, affiliated to GGSIP University, has been functioning under the aegis of the AICTE since 2000 and has been running on rented accommodation. In 2000, the college had applied to the DDA for five acres of land for construction of the college building at a permanent site in accordance with the AICTE norms. Initially, DDA allotted three acres of land at Rohini. However, it was subsequently cancelled in 2004-2005. The college, which has been getting interim permission to start academic session during 2006-2011, was later put in the category of “withdrawal of approval status” by the AICTE.
New Delhi: Ignoring opposition from some quarters, HRD Ministry has asked all central universities to complete their National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) accreditation as per UGC regulations. “UGC will take up the matter with NAAC for opening the Regional Centers to expedite the process of accreditation,” said a government statement on Saturday. So far only 10-12 of the 39 central universities are accredited. Older universities like Delhi University and new varsities have till now shied away from going through the process due to several reasons. UGC, governing higher education in the country, had in March, 2013 come out with a notification making it mandatory for all universities to get letters of accreditation within six months from NAAC.
“UGC will take up the matter with NAAC for opening the Regional Centers to expedite the process of accreditation,” said a government statement on Saturday.
The NAAC is an autonomous body established by the UGC to assess and accredit institutions of higher education in the country. A working group of vice chancellors has also been constituted to frame guidelines on common admission, common curriculum, student mobility, faculty mobility and a national system of credit transfer. On the last day of the two-day vice chancellors retreat in Chandigarh, HRD Minister Smriti Irani today exhorted all VCs — in wake of sexual harassment of a student in Viswa Bharati University — to ensure prevention of sexual harassment of students and staff at all costs. It was also decided to form another working Group for developing a framework for the National Ranking System and submit its report within one month. The issue of holding a common admission and following a common curriculum was discussed, following which it was decided to set up a working group comprising of some VCs to frame guidelines. Older Universities such as DU and JNU, who hold their exams separately, are reported to be against a common admission programme. Officials said the issue would be taken up further after the guidelines are framed. On Friday, HRD Minister Smriti Irani has discussed a single legislation proposal with the vice-chancellors of 39 central universities to govern all the central varsities and their comments have been sought on the issue. The Chandigarh meeting came after Irani had held similar interactions with directors of IITs and IIMs. At the end of the vice chancellors meet, it was decided to set up Council of Industry Higher Education Collaboration.
(CIHEC) is being operationalised to identify initiatives to promote research, mobilise resources, develop market ready manpower and enhance employability. The council will collaborate with placement cells of central universities for identification of the emerging areas as per the requirement of the neighbouring industries to make the students employment ready. The CIHEC will also help train counsellors at all Placement Cells for better counselling and placements. Concerns were also raised about the incidents of sexual harassments against girl students in campuses at the meet, following which Irani “exhorted” all VCs to ensure prevention of sexual harassment of students and staff at all costs. “All Central Universities should ensure proper facilities and infrastructure for disabled students”, she added. Her assertion came against the backdrop of the alleged sexual harassment of a Sikkimese girl in Visa Bharati University recently. The girl quit the varsity on Friday. Focusing on the skilling initiatives, it was decided to set up 100 Centres of skilling excellence called ‘Knowledge Upgradation centre for Skilled Human Action and Learning’ (KUSHAL) within a year.
These centres will coordinate the entire skill development efforts of higher educational institutions. Enhanced funding shall be provided by the UGC and it will frame guidelines on the scheme within a month. The VCs were requested to encourage the faculty in central universities to offer free online courses to citizens under the digital India initiative. The universities were also asked to identify 40 great personalities and locate the school, colleges and universities which had the proud privilege of teaching these great personalities and take action to develop and improve the facilities and infrastructure in these institutions. Every central university was also asked to display on its website, within a month, all relevant information including profile of teachers, calendar of activity of university, academic calendar, names of members of all statutory bodies along with their tenure, research output, information on budget, vacancy, tenure of Registrar and Finance officer. UGC was also requested to formulate regulations where in the students coming out of vocational stream are not discriminated against vis-a vis the students coming out of general streams. Under the campus connect programme, all the central universities were asked to ensure that their campuses/constituent colleges become fully wi-fi enabled as soon as possible. Besides, under the ‘global initiative for academic networks programme’, the universities were told to provide a list of eminent scholars and researchers within a month, both from within the country and outside, who they would like to invite in their universities as guest speakers.
Prepsure | Rruchi Shrimalli | September 10, 2014
The University Grants Commission (UGC) had asked all the 16 Indian Institutes of technology (IITs), the premier technology institutes of India, to make sure that the degrees they are offering are aligned to those recognised by them. IITs took a strog exception to the interference of the higher education regulator in the IIT system and complained about it to the Human Resources Development (HRD) Minister Smriti Irani. IITs are autonomous engineering institutes of national importance which are governed by The Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 in terms of powers, duties, framework for governance etc. They have argued that they are not covered by the UGC Act. The UGC directive may force them to re-structure or re-name their four-year Bachelors of Science (BS) programmes or dual degree programmes. The UGC has argued that it is the only statutory body in India to specify degrees in all domains of knowledge – including medicine, agriculture and engineering. The HRD Ministry backed the UGC stand saying that the IITs should try to correct the mismatch with UGC degree specifications.
Taking cognisance of the protests by IITs, Irani has decided to escalate the UGC-IIT row and take it to the Law Ministry. Ministry of Law will examine Section 22 of the UGC Act, 1956 which deals with ‘Right to confer degrees’ and give its opinion on whether it is applicable to the IITs or not. Before referring to the Law Minsitry, Irani will meet the Standing Committee of the IIT Council (SCIC) on September 12, and the IIT Council on September 22 to discuss the issue.
Officials say that the only ways to resolve the issue are:
- IITs accept the UGC’s supremacy, or
- IIT Act, 1961 should be amended to override all conflicting provisions of any other Acts to allow IITs to determine their own academic programmes and degrees, or
- UGC amends its July 5 gazette notification on degree programmes specifications and their duration to allow for the IIT courses.
This time around, the UGC chairman (who is a member of the IIT Council but has mostly stayed off its meetings) will attend the council meet too so that the issue can be resolved quickly.