Home » AICTE » HRD Ministry unveils ranking framework for colleges and universities : National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF)

HRD Ministry unveils ranking framework for colleges and universities : National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF)

Recent Posts

Categories

For WhatsApp promotional Post +91 9387831970

Enter your email address to follow this web portal and receive notifications of new posts by email / unsubscribe at anytime...We don’t do spam

The New Indian Express | By: Express News Service | New Delhi | September 30, 2015 |

HRD Minister Smriti Irani said the new ranking framework has been drafted to provide “an Indian context to educational aspirations and needs” HRD Minister Smriti Irani said the new ranking framework has been drafted to provide “an Indian context to educational aspirations and needs”

The Human Resource Development (HRD) Ministry Tuesday unveiled a first-of-its-kind indigenous ranking framework for higher education institutions, in response to global rankings in which Indian universities and colleges usually do not fare too well. The framework is different from global rankings in that it will judge institutions based on country-specific parameters. HRD Minister Smriti Irani said the new ranking framework has been drafted to provide “an Indian context to educational aspirations and needs”. This will, she added, help institutions that conduct research in languages other than English and are focused on inclusive education, two factors that are overlooked by international agencies. The government aims to come out with the first round of ranking before the next academic year.

The initiative is open to both private and public institutions across all disciplines and is not mandatory. However, VS Oberoi, secretary, higher education, said that all 122 centrally-funded institutions — including all central universities, IITs and IIMs —will participate in the first round of ranking which will be unveiled by April next year. The framework is primarily divided into two categories: Category A will cover institutions with academic autonomy and greater focus on research and category B will comprise colleges and centres affiliated to a university and more focused on teaching. An institution can volunteer to be ranked in both categories. Justifying the division of the framework into two categories, Professor Surendra Prasad, chairman of the National Board of Accreditation, said this would enable “an apple-to-apple comparison”. – Courtesy

Govt unveils indigenous ranking framework for higher education : 30 September 2015 | Prashant K. Nanda |

The ranking will be done by an independent and autonomous body and the exercise will be an annual affair

New Delhi: The government on Tuesday unveiled an indigenous ranking framework for higher educational institutions that it believes will give Indian institutions a competitive platform free of any international bias. The framework will evaluate institutions on five parameters—teaching, learning and resources (TLR); research, professional practice and collaborative performance (RPC); graduation outcome (GO); outreach and inclusivity (OI); and perception (PR) of end users. Initially, it will be voluntary for institutions to sign up for the ranking. Institutions will have to provide data online by 31 December, and the final ranking will be unveiled in the first week of April before the new academic session begins, higher education secretary Vinay S. Oberoi said.

The ranking will be done by an independent and autonomous body and the exercise will be an annual affair. At an event to unveil to ranking framework, human resources development (HRD) minister Smriti Irani cited three fundamental reasons for coming up with an indigenous ranking framework. She said international ranking agencies only consider research work done in English; the body of work in regional languages is not considered. Social inclusion or the reservation system is the second reason and giving new institutions a level playing field with older institutions is the other key reason behind the move, Irani said. The exercise will have an Indian context and reflect educational aspiration of Indians but shall be done in a completely “transparent manner”, she said. “The National Institutional Ranking Framework marks a paradigm shift by including perceptions of students and parents in the ranking,” Irani said.

“Inclusivity of our institutions is not taken into account in international rankings,” she said, and added that the ranking framework will provide a transparent means for institutions to engage with students. When asked whether reservations or social inclusion will take away from the competitiveness of institutions as social inclusion is not always based on merit, Oberoi said this aspect was part of the institutional framework. “It is not going to alter the (reservations) policy but reflect it,” the secretary added. University Grants Commission chairman Ved Prakash said he does not see any disadvantage because of this parameter as it is just one of the five key parameters for evaluating an institution. For the last two years, the HRD ministry has been deliberating on the subject and it picked up pace in the last one year after Prime Minister Narendra Modi sought development of an indigenous ranking for Indian institutions. The initial impetus for such a ranking came after Indian universities, including the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) failed to garner a respectable ranking year after year in the World University Rankings, done by various international agencies like Times Higher Education and Quacquarelli Symonds or QS. None of the Indian institutes featured among the Top 200 universities. However, earlier this month, British ranking agency Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) ranked the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, and the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, at 147 and 179, respectively, in the QS World University Rankings for 2015-16.

This is the first time in years that two Indian institutes have been placed in the Top 200 of global education. The ministry will rank institutions vertically—engineering, management, universities, etc. Besides, it will also create two categories. Category A: those focusing on research and teaching; and Category B: those focusing primarily on teaching. Keeping in mind the diversity of institutions, both in terms of type and quality, the idea of a single overall ranking was abandoned in favour of separate rankings based on education verticals, said Surendra Prasad, chairman of the National Board of Accreditation, an autonomous body that accredits technical education subjects. He is part of a panel of experts involved in devising the ranking framework. The ministry on Tuesday unveiled the ranking framework for engineering and management. In the next four weeks, it will come out with the frameworks for other sectors. – Courtesy

Click here Visit the Portal of National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), MHRD.

Click here to download Ranking Framework for Engineering Institutions

Click here to download Ranking Framework for Management Institutions

The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) has been accepted by the MHRD and launched by Honourable Minister for Human Resource development on 29th September 2015. This framework outlines a methodology to rank institutions across the country.  This framework outlines a methodology to rank institutions across the country. The methodology draws from the overall recommendations broad understanding arrived at by a Core Committee set up by MHRD, to identify the broad parameters for ranking various universities and institutions. The parameters broadly cover “Teaching, Learning and Resources,” “Research and Professional Practices,” “Graduation Outcomes,” “Outreach and Inclusivity,” and “Perception”. Although the Ranking Frameworks are similar, the exact methodologies are domain specific. Ranking methods have been worked out for engineering and management institutions, while those for other domains will be announced soon.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About

Engineering, Science & Technology Resources Portal... Where Teaching and Learning in a Networked World…

Category

Archives