Home » Higher Education » After IIEST ranked 83 by NIRF, HRD ministry on course correction mode in research-related data validation

After IIEST ranked 83 by NIRF, HRD ministry on course correction mode in research-related data validation

Recent Posts

6000+ Academic followers…

6000+ Academic followers...

Click here to connect / follow ...


Enter your email address to follow this web portal and receive notifications of new posts by email / unsubscribe at anytime...We don’t do spam

Click here to go back to Homepage

Portal Stats

  • 695,343 hits

Live Traffic

Flag Counter


The Economic Times | By Anubhuti Vishnoi, ET Bureau | 20 Apr, 2016 |

NEW DELHI: Days after the human resource development ( HRD) ministry released the first National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), questions are being raised over the methodology used for data validation and higher ranks secured by some institutes. The ministry is now planning to set up a panel to look into all these issues, with the primary focus on data authenticity and validation for rankings, reliable sources told ET. While some institutes and experts are questioning the authenticity of the rankings, the Indian Institute of Engineering, Science & Technology (IIEST) has officially taken up the issue with Smriti Irani-led ministry.  It has expressed “shock” at being ranked 83 and pointed out “glitches” in research-related data validation. Still others questioned how not a single NIT was among the top 10 engineering rankings, with even the newest of IITs like Ropar and Patna scoring higher than the well-known NITs at Surathkal, Trichy and Warangal. Private institutes have pointed out that government-run institutions have bagged all top slots.

The panel is likely to look at ways to ensure NIRF 2017 is more robust. Higher education secretary is likely to head the committee. “There is a proposal to set up a committee following the 2016 rankings. Many institutes have written to us with differing views and opinions and we will see what can be useful for the next rankings. Data validation was a big challenge for general colleges and we hope to address this,” said Surendra Prasad, National Board of Accreditation chairman and member of the core committee on NIRF. An IIEST clarification said: “It has been found that on research and publication parameter IIEST Shibpur scored abysmally low, which is , in no way, a reflection of the actual scenario.  Out of 100, IIEST scored only 22.20 compared to 80.30 by NIT Trichy and 74.72 by Vellore Institute of Technology.” “I understand coordination and data issues have led to this, but it has demoralised faculty and students.  I have taken it up with the ministry; they have been very supportive. It appears NIC failed to enter the name of our institute properly and so we ended up scoring zero on publications, though we have record publications to our credit. We ended up getting only a 24-hour window to upload our data,” IIEST director AK Ray told ET. – Courtesy


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Engineering, Science & Technology Resources Portal... Where Teaching and Learning in a Networked World…