Home » UGC » New API criteria for college and university teachers provides more flexibility: HRD

New API criteria for college and university teachers provides more flexibility: HRD

Recent Posts


Click here to follow on Facebook

Enter your email address to follow this web portal and receive notifications of new posts by email / unsubscribe at anytime...We don’t do spam

Click here to go back to Homepage

Portal Stats

  • 748,813 hits

Live Traffic

Flag Counter

Click here for Engineering Calender


The Times of India | PTI | May 24, 2016 |

NEW DELHI: The human resource development (HRD) ministry on Tuesday defended the new University Grants Commissions ( UGC ) criteria for Academic Performance Indicators (API) for college and university teachers, saying it provides “more flexibility” even as it ruled out any possibility of reduction in number of teaching jobs. Several teachers’ bodies like Delhi University Teachers’ Association have held protests against the recently notified API criteria and sought its withdrawal by UGC, claiming that it was “anti-academic” and the provision for allowing students’ feedback on teachers would open a Pandora’s box.  Speaking at a press conference in New Delhi, higher education secretary in the HRD Ministry V S Oberoi said that the new API norms provided “more flexibility” and as per the rules only “serious” students who have more than 75 per cent attendance will be able to give their feedback.

UGC Chairman Ved Prakash, who was also present, said there are three categories: teaching, research and co-curricular and as per the new criterion, there is more flexibility between the latter.  Responding to questions, Oberoi said that there was no reason why the number of teaching jobs may be affected in any way because of the new criteria “as the number of teaching hours remains the same”.- Courtesy

Centre relaxes norms on higher education :  The Hindu | Special Correspondent  |

The government on Tuesday sought to clear the air on a new set of regulations for college and university teachers and doctoral students, pertaining to issues ranging from teaching hours to guidelines for Ph.D. and M.Phil. courses.  While earlier, the weekly teaching workload was 16, 14 and 14 hours for assistant professors, associate professors and professors, these are now 18, 16 and 14 hours, respectively. This happens at a time when teachers’ bodies of Delhi University have already begun protests against the regulations.  In a joint press conference with UGC chairman Ved Prakash, Higher Education Secretary Vinay Sheel Oberoi sought to dispel the perception that an increase in workload at assistant professor and associate professor levels for regular faculty members would throw out ad hoc teachers.

‘Advisory’ role

“The two hours’ increase in teaching workload at these two levels are in the form of an advisory to help students with special needs. They will not be counted in API scores,” Mr. Oberoi said. A new set of regulations has capped the time period allowed for completion of Ph.D. to six years, he said. The minimum permissible duration will be three years. Similarly, the M.Phil. course would have to vary from a minimum of one year to a maximum of two.  There is, however, a relaxation of two years for women pursuing research leading to a Ph.D. and one year for M.Phil. The relaxation would also apply to candidates with more than 40 per cent disability.  –  Courtesy

UGC on minimum qualifications for appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the maintenance of Standards in Higher Education 3rd Amendment & Academic Performance Indicators (API) for Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) Regulations, 2016 – Gazette  Notification , 4th May 2016



  1. Dr. Manish Kumar Verma says:

    According to the new gazette 2 Hours of practical classes are to be counted as one hour. This reduces the significance of practicals as well as cuts half the workload of science faculty requirement, since practical classes form a large section of work load. Actual workload calculation according to new rules for science teachers comes out to be 36 hours of teaching which is double the present workload. Other administrative responsibilities leaves no time for teachers to prepare for their lectures.
    Forget about research to be done, there is no time left for that.
    Almost all the contractual and adhoc faculty throughout the nation will be left jobless after giving sp much time of their precious lives in teaching.

  2. API assistant. Professor promotion of ugc more difficult. CATEGORY-III Because any assistant professor joined dated 01-03-2012 (stage-1) in four years(20 research paper complete one Ph.D, 5 submitted Ph.d,one Orientation program ,Seven research paper present national seminars, three research paper international seminars, Organizing national seminars in 2009)but one Refresher
    Course in 2015 Screening Committee give promotion stage 2 with refresher course date. But (second refresher course 2016 )on time in 9 year service and( CATEGORY-III Assistant Professor with completed service of five stage 2 )Screening Committee say you are not eligibility goto stage 3.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


Engineering, Science & Technology Resources Portal... Where Teaching and Learning in a Networked World…