Home » Uncategorized

Category Archives: Uncategorized

GREEN ROOM: Kerala’s biggest Startup – SME Conclave & Launch of B’Hub

Federal Bank presents GREEN ROOM: Kerala’s biggest Startup – SME Conclave & Launch of B’Hub

02 July 2017, Girideepam Convention Centre, Mar Ivanios Vidyanagar, Trivandrum, Kerala, South India

Organised by Mar Baselios College of Engineering & Technology & Bloombloom, in association with The Federal Bank Limited & The Kerala Startup Mission.


A daylong event, which will invite the substantial attention of the media, will have speakers from various disciplines addressing the gathering. A colourful Inaugural session will be followed by Sessions, Panel discussions etc. that will throw light into finding ways to enrich innovations in the SME-Startup sector in India. The event will mark the launch of B’Hub, a unique networking hub in educational campuses, aimed to build local communities around innovations and entrepreneurship. First of its kind model is getting launched during this day, which will be rolled out to 50 other locations in the country initially as well as globally.

Technology is advancing in such a faster pace that every industry is going to be disrupted in the future and it is hence important to innovate and be sustainable. At the same time, Industries can play the most important role in accelerating startups in its journey from zero to one. The event focuses on creating awareness among the Industries to contribute effectively to the innovation ecosystem, evolve models to collaborate with startups. This event will discuss various models of effective engagement for industries with startups and campuses. There will be follow-up programs in B’Hubs for constant interactions and thus to evolve B’Hubs as a happening place for businesses. – Take a Look a http://bhubs.bloombloom.co/       –      http://greenroomglobal.com/

CBSE says NEET results will be delayed, academic schedule hit

The Times of India | L Saravanan | TNN | Jun 7, 2017 |

MADURAI: The Central Board of Secondary Education on Tuesday told the Madurai bench of the Madras high court that it would need at least 15 days to declare the results of NEET-2017, leaving thousands of students across the country in limbo and admission schedules for professional courses this academic year all askew.  Even if the court immediately lifts an interim stay on “all further proceedings” with regard to NEET, CBSE will have to take time to come out with the answer key, restart evaluation of answer scripts and declare results, the board said. A division bench of Madras high court had on May 24 stayed all further proceedings till June 7; CBSE took 13 days to file a counter affidavit to PILs. “The delay in declaring re sults due to the interim order is already beyond permissible limit,” the board said. “CBSE will require 15 days to declare the result if it is permitted to do so…CBSE has to complete the remaining steps for preparation of results -hosting of OMR [optical mark recognition] on the website and hosting of the answer key -which will require 15 days.”

Engineering colleges across the country have to complete counselling by July 30 and the deadline for medical collegesuniversities is September 30. With the delay, many aspiring MBBS students have sought admission to engineering courses.  “We generally begin engineering counselling after the first round of MBBS admissions, to prevent engineering seats going waste,” said a Tamil Nadu Engineering Admission committee official. Many states will require at least six weeks to complete engineering admissions. For that, the counselling for single window admission of students into engineering courses should begin at least by the last week of this month, officials said. If NEET results are delayed, medical counselling ses sions, especially in states like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra, which have more than 40 medical colleges each, would be packed. The MCI had ordered that admission to all medical colleges -government, self-financing and deemed universities -have to be conducted by a state authority.  NEET examinations were held across the nation on May 7 in 10 different languages.Soon after the tests, PILs were filed in various courts, raising several issues. In the Madurai bench of the Madras high court, a batch of PILs were filed on the ground that NEET question papers were not uniform for different languages, and that it resulted in some vernacular languages having an easy set of questions.

On Tuesday, calling for lifting of the May 24 stay order, CBSE said: “If the stay is not vacated, the future of 11.38 lakh candidates who appeared for the NEET would be jeopardised. It would create unrest among the stakeholders. The procedures to complete the medical and dental admission as directed by the Supreme Court could not be complied. Besides, CBSE would face contempt of court.” Justifying NEET, CBSE regional officer Mahesh D Dharmadhikari denied the petitioners’ arguments that question papers were different in vernacular languages and that English question papers were tougher than Hindi and Gujarati papers (the PIL had also claimed that the Gujarati question paper was the easiest of all papers). CBSE said it had prepared 10 sets of question papers of “similar difficulty level”. Of the 10, four sets were randomly selected for translation into vernacular languages and the remaining six sets were used for English and Hindi. From four sets translated in vernacular languages, three sets were randomly picked for printing. On the day of examination, the competent authority decided on two sets of question papers. Of the 11.38 lakh students registered for NEET, only 47,853 opted for the examination in Gujarati; 34,417 chose Bengali, 15,206 wrote in Tamil, 3,810 in Assamese, 1,766 in Telugu, 978 in Marathi, 712 in Kannada and 452 in Oriya, the officer said. – Courtesy

New UTS:INSEARCH Aspire scholarship program for Indian high school students heading for Australia’s top young university

India Education Diary | |

New Delhi: Indian high school students, who aim to study at the University of Technology in Sydney, are now eligible to apply for an exciting scholarship program. The new UTS:INSEARCH Aspire Scholarship Program will offer a total of AUD3.5 million (INR 16.8 crores) to 700 students from India and the Subcontinent over the next four years. Each scholarship, worth AUD5,000, will be awarded to meritorious students, to be used in their second semester at UTS:INSEARCH. “We know that there are many students from India who are interested in the University of Technology Sydney’s innovative approach to learning. The university’s strong collaboration with employers and industry enhances the opportunities for interesting and rewarding careers,” said Belinda Howell, Chief Market Development Officer for UTS:INSEARCH.  “We are pleased to launch the Aspire Scholarship program to encourage students from India, by supporting their career aspirations and helping them prepare to achieve success at university and beyond.”

“According to UNESCO’s 2017 Global Flow of Tertiary-Level Students figures, Australia has become the second most preferred destination for Indian students studying abroad, surpassing the UK,” said Ms Howell. The latest end-of-year international student enrolment data (2016) shows that more than 78,000 students from India are enrolled in education in Australia, representing 11% of all international student enrolments. Anil Gulati, a civil engineering student at the University of Technology Sydney from Panchkula, Haryana, shares his experience. “UTS:INSEARCH provided me with the opportunity to build a great foundation for my future study in the field of civil engineering,” said Mr Gulati.  “I always thought of Australia as a great place to study engineering because of its rapid development. I chose the UTS Faculty of Engineering and IT for its amazing facilities, equipment and laboratories,” he said. Mr Gulati completed his Diploma of Engineering at UTS:INSEARCH in 2016, and is now pursuing his Bachelor in Engineering degree at the University of Technology Sydney.

· The Aspire Scholarship Program is available for new students from India who commence their diploma studies at UTS:INSEARCH between 2017 and 2020
· Scholarships are valued at AUD$5,000 each, and are applied to the recipient’s tuition fees in their second semester at UTS:INSEARCH
· 700 scholarships are available between 2017-2020 for students from India and the Subcontinent
· Full terms and conditions are available at: insearch.edu.au/aspire


Country of Nationality Eligible Programs 2017-2020 Scholarship Requirements (5 marks above the minimum academic requirements)
India DIPLOMA Year 12 ISC/CBSE with academic subjects 65% or Year 12 Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala and West Bengal State Boards 65% or Year 12. Other State Boards 70% (best 4 relevant academic subjects)

British Council announces GREAT Scholarships 2017 worth INR 100 million

The British Council is delighted to announce GREAT Education scholarships for the year 2017. The total worth of these scholarships is over 1 million pounds. With 198 scholarships on offer, it is a great opportunity for Indian students wishing to make the most of their UK education. Students may avail these scholarships for 29 undergraduate and 169 postgraduate courses. These include Engineering, Law, Business, Art & Design, Biosciences, IT and more; at 40 UK institutions across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. To explore a range of scholarship options download the guide today!

“We are delighted to announce 198 GREAT Education scholarships for the 2017 academic year in partnership with 40 UK universities.Worth over £1 million, the scholarships comprise 169postgraduate and 29 undergraduate awards at universities across the UK – from art and design to engineering, law, and management.We want the best and brightest students from across India to apply. If successful you’ll be joining almost500,000 international students from 200 countries who chose a world-class UK education each year.UK universities are international and are proud of their diverse staff and student populations. In fact,over 50% of British Academics’ published research is with an international contributor.Such diversity and international connections bring new approaches and fresh thinking. We believe that the problems and challenges you’ll be addressing over the next 50 years will need global solution sand that the unique experiences, knowledge, networks and confidence gained from a world-class UK higher education course gives you the best platform to transform your life, community and country. Good luck!” Alan Gemmell OBE Director British Council India .  Click here to download the GuideGREAT Scholarship Guide 2017

95% engineers in India unfit for software development jobs: Aspiring Minds study

The Hindu Business Line | PTI | New Delhi | 20 April 2017 |

Image for representational purpose only.

Image for representational purpose only.

Over 36,000 engineering students from IT related branches of over 500 colleges took Automata test.  Programming skills are five times poorer for tier III colleges as compared to tier 1 colleges, the survey noted.

“Lack of programming skills is adversely impacting the IT and data science ecosystem in India. The world is moving towards introducing programming to three-year-old! India needs to catch up,” Aspiring Minds CTO and co-founder Varun Aggarwal said.  The employability gap can be attributed to rote learning based approaches rather than actually writing programmes on a computer for different problems. Also, there is a dearth of good teachers for programming, since most good programmers get jobs in industry at good salaries, the study said.  Moreover, programming skills are five times poorer for tier III colleges as compared to tier 1 colleges. “Sixty nine per cent of candidates from top 100 colleges are able to write a compilable code versus rest of the colleges where only 31 per cent are able to write a compilable code,” the report said. –  Courtesy   / Read More…     http://www.aspiringminds.com/technology/automata        /      http://www.aspiringminds.com/

IIT BHU raises objection on NIRF ranking 2017, says list based on ‘incomplete data’

The Indian Express | Express Web Desk | New Delhi |  April 19, 2017 | Opinion |

IIT BHU said the publication data as considered by NIRF is not complete and does not match with the publication data available on Web of Science, Scopus and Indian Citation Index.

Sixteen days after the Ministry of Human Resource Development released the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) 2017, the Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) today said IIT (BHU) Varanasi at 31 rank under the top engineering colleges list is “based on incomplete publication/patent data obtained by NIRF directly from third party like — Scopus, Web of Sciences, Indian Citation Index and Thomas Reuter”. At a press conference Director, IIT (BHU) Prof Rajeev Sangal informed the research publication was obtained by NIRF directly from third party platforms instead of collecting it from respective Institution. “The publication data as considered by NIRF is not complete and does not match with the publication data available on Web of Science, Scopus and Indian Citation Index. Actually, it is very less than the actual. This has adversely affected rank of IIT (BHU),” he said.

Prof Sangal said the total research publications of the institute as published in calendar year 2013, 2014 and 2015 in Scopus is approximately 1500, while NIRF has shown only 205.  Further, total research publication in Web of Science is 1006, but NIRF has shown only 827. Institute has published total 125 research publication in Indian Citation Index, while NIRF has shown only 34. Director, IIT(BHU) has further informed that NIRF has picked patent-related data also from third party and did not take into account the data provided by Institute. “The third party namely Thomas Reuter has not published the patent related data of the Institute on its platform. Hence, based on this incomplete information only, NIRF has given zero marks to IIT(BHU) for publication as well as grant of patent. Though, as per our records our few patents has been published and granted,” he said.  Prof Sangal said that that he is hopeful that if these deficiencies are removed ranking of IIT (BHU) may become under top 20 engineering institutions. Director, IIT (BHU) has also informed that an e-mail has also been sent to NIRF for rectifying this data, and reply from them is awaited.  The Ministry of Human Resource Development had on April 3 released the ranking for engineering along with university, college, pharmaceutical institute, management institute and overall educational institute. Last year, IIT BHU was at number 14 but this year its rank fell down to 31. –  Courtesy

Drop courses with few takers: Central government

Kritika Sharma | Fri, 24 Mar 2017 |  New Delhi |  DNA  |

Analysis of All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) shows that chemical and textile engineering are not popular among students

Representational image

In order to offer more market-friendly courses to engineering aspirants, the central government has asked technical institutions including the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) to shut courses that are not getting a good response. According to government’s own data, around 400 private technical institutions were shut down in the last three years because they were not getting sufficient number of students, and also, those who passed out from those institutions were not employable.  Taking a review of the situation, the Ministry decided to overhaul the engineering education system. It has now on its own, appealed to centrally funded technical institutions to close down the branches and courses that have seen less admissions in the past three years.  The Ministry has also said if the institutions want to introduce new courses and disciplines; they should do so after analysing market opportunity, employability and requirement of higher education.

“All Centrally Funded Technical Institutions (CFTIs), which are participating in joint counseling sessions have been asked to review the position of vacant seats in the last three years and to revise the number of seats in each discipline after considering employment opportunities, national requirements, available infrastructure and scope for future,” Mahendra Nath Pandey, Minister of State for HRD, told Rajya Sabha in a written reply. “CFTIs may also consider closure of some disciplines or keep them in abeyance for a few years after following the due process,” he said.  Various disciplines of engineering courses are available under Chemical, Software, Civil and Electronics engineering across various colleges in India. An analysis of All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) shows that most number of students enrol for mechanical engineering, followed by computer science, electronics and civil engineering. Branches like chemical and textile engineering get few takers.  The central government has taken a similar route with school education also. It recently asked the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to shut down vocational courses that have very few takers. The board has recently issued a circular with which they have discontinued 34 of its vocational courses.


Steps taken by government to overhaul engineering education

  1. Asking institutes to close down branches that are not getting many takers.
  2. Making internships mandatory for students to get their engineering degree.
  3. Introducing a single-window entrance system on the lines of NEET for all engineering colleges.
  4. Making sure that the new courses that are started in college are market-friendly. –  Courtesy

Google Scholar is a serious alternative to Web of Science

Anne-Wil Harzing | Professor of International Management at Middlesex University | London | Opinion | LSE Impact Blog |

Many bibliometricians and university administrators remain wary of Google Scholar citation data, preferring “the gold standard” of Web of Science instead. Anne-Wil Harzing, who developed the Publish or Perish software that uses Google Scholar data, here sets out to challenge some of the misconceptions about this data source and explain why it offers a serious alternative to Web of Science. In addition to its flaws having been overstated, Google Scholar’s coverage of high-quality publications is more comprehensive in many areas, including in the social sciences and humanities, books and book chapters, conference proceedings and non-English language publications.

Publish or Perish uses Google Scholar as one of its data sources (the other being Microsoft Academic). Many bibliometricians and university administrators are fairly conservative in their approach to citation analysis. It is not unusual to see them prefer the Web of Science (ISI for short) as “the gold standard” and discard Google Scholar out of hand, simply because they have heard some wild-west stories about its “overly generous” coverage. These stories are typically based one or more of the following misconceptions, which I will dispute below.

  • First, the impression that everything “on the web” citing an academic’s work counts as a citation.
  • Second, the assumption that any publication that is not listed in the Web of Science is not worth considering at all.
  • Third, a general impression that citation counts in Google Scholar are completely unreliable.

Not everything published on the internet counts in Google Scholar

Some academics are under the misplaced impression that anything posted on the internet that includes references will be counted in Google Scholar. This might also be the source behind the misconception that one can put simply put phantom papers online to improve one’s citation count. However, Google Scholar only indexes scholarly publications. As its website indicates: “we work with publishers of scholarly information to index peer-reviewed papers, theses, preprints, abstracts, and technical reports from all disciplines of research.”  Some non-scholarly citations, such as student handbooks, library guides or editorial notes slip through. However, incidental problems in this regard are unlikely to distort cita­tion metrics, especially robust ones such as the h-index. Hence, although there might be some overestimation of the number of non-scholarly cita­tions in Google Scholar, for many disciplines this is preferable to the very significant and systematic underestimation of scholarly citations in ISI or Scopus. Moreover, as long as one compares like with like, i.e. compares citation records for the same data source, this should not be a problem at all.

Non-ISI listed publications can be high-quality publications

There is also a frequent assumption amongst research administrators that ISI listing is a stamp of quality and that hence one should ignore non-ISI listed publications and citations. There are two problems with this assumption. First, ISI has a bias towards science, English-language and North American journals. Second, ISI completely ignores a vast majority of publications in the social sciences and humanities.

  • ISI journal listing is very incomplete in the social sciences and humanities: ISI’s listing of journals is much more comprehensive in the sciences than in the social sciences and humanities. Butler (2006) analysed the distribution of publication output by field for Australian universities between 1999 and 2001. She found that whereas for the chemical, biological, physical and medical/health sciences between 69.3% and 84.6% of the publications were published in ISI listed journals, this was the case for only 4.4%-18.7% of the publica­tions in the social sciences such as management, history education and arts. Many high-quality journals in the field of economics and business are not ISI listed. Only 30%-40% of the journals in accounting, marketing and general management and strategy listed on my Journal Quality List (already a pretty selective list) are ISI listed. There is no doubt that – on average – journals that are ISI listed are perceived to be of higher quality. However, there is a very substantial number of non-ISI indexed journals that have a higher than average h-index.
  • ISI has very limited coverage of non-journal publications: second, even in the cited reference search, ISI only includes citations in ISI listed journals. In the general search function it completely ignores any publications that are not in ISI-listed journals. As a result a vast majority of publications and citations in the social sciences and humanities, as well as in engineering and computer science, are ignored. In the social sciences and huma­nities this is mainly caused by a complete neglect of books, book chapters, publications in languages other than English, and publications in non-ISI listed journals. In engineering and computer science, this is mostly caused by a neglect of conference proceedings. ISI has recently introduced conference proceedings in its database. However, it does not provide any details of which conferences are covered beyond listing some disciplines that are covered. I was unable to find any of my own publications in conference proceedings. As a result ISI very seriously underestimates both the number of publications and the num­ber of citations for academics in the social sciences and humanities and in engineering and computer science.

Google Scholar’s flaws have been played up far too much

Peter Jacsó, a prominent academic in information and library science, has published several rather critical articles about Google Scholar (e.g. Jacsó, 2006a and 2006b). When confronted with titles such as “Dubious hit counts and cuckoo’s eggs” and “Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts”, Deans, academic administrators and tenure/­promotion committees could be excused for assuming Google Scholar provides unreliable data. However, the bulk of Jacsó’s critique is levelled at Google Scholar’s inconsistent number of results for keyword searches, which are not at all relevant for the author and journal impact searches that most academics use Publish or Perish for. For these types of searches, the following caveats are important.

  • Citation metrics are robust and insensitive to occasional errors: most of the metrics used in Publish or Perish are fairly robust and insensitive to occasional errors as they will not generally change the h-index or g-index and will only have a minor impact on the number of citations per paper. There is no doubt that Google Scholar’s automatic parsing occasionally provi­des us with nonsensical results. However, these errors do not appear to be as frequent or as important as implied by Jacsó’s articles. They also do not generally impact the results of author or journal queries much, if at all.
  • Google Scholar parsing has improved significantly: Google Scholar has also significantly improved its parsing since the errors were pointed out to them. However, many academics are still referring to Jacsó’s 2006 articles as convincing arguments against any use of Google Scholar. I would argue this is inappropriate. As academics, we are only all too well aware that all of our research results include a certain error margin. We cannot expect citation data to be any different.
  • Google Scholar errors are random rather than systematic: what is most important is that errors are random rather than systematic. I have no reason to believe that the Google Scholar errors identified in Jacsó’s articles are anything else than random. Hence they will not normally advantage or disadvantage individual academics or journals.
  • ISI and Scopus have systematic errors of coverage: in contrast, commercial databases such as ISI and Scopus have systematic errors as they do not include many journals in the social sciences and humanities, nor have good coverage of conferences proceedings, books or book chapters. Therefore, although it is always a good idea to use multiple data sources, rejecting Google Scholar out of hand because of presu­med parsing errors is not rational. Nor is presuming ISI is error-free simply because it charges high subscription fees.


As I have argued in the past, Google Scholar and Publish or Perish have democratised citation analysis. Rather than leaving it in the hands of those with access to commercial databases with high subscription fees, anyone with a computer and internet access can now run their own analyses. If you’d like to know more about this, have a look at this presentation.

This blog post originally appeared on the author’s personal website and is republished here with permission. Copyright © 2017 Anne-Wil Harzing.  Featured image credit: Viele bunte Bälle by Maret Hosemann (licensed under a CC BY 2.0 license).

Note: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of the LSE Impact Blog, nor of the London School of Economics. Please review our comments policy if you have any concerns on posting a comment below.

About the author

Anne-Wil Harzing is Professor of International Management at Middlesex University, London. In addition to her academic duties, she also maintains the Journal Quality List and is the driving force behind the popular Publish or Perish software program. –  Courtesy

Now, West Bengal opposes Centre’s common engineering admission test (NEET)

The Times of India | Somdatta Basu | TNN | Mar 14, 2017 |

KOLKATA: If you thought the saffron landslide in the recent assembly polls will prompt Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee to mend her relations with the Centre, think again. Mamata sticks to her “state first” policy and allows her officers to attend meetings in Delhi on a case-to-case basis, the bottomline being Bengal’s interests.  For instance, she has allowed state higher education secretary Vivek Kumar to attend an MHRD meeting in Delhi on Tuesday and oppose the Centre’s proposal to introduce a single national-level entry test for engineering courses from 2018 on the lines of National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for medical entrance. Earlier, she also allowed state tourism secretary Ajit Ranjan Bardhan to take up tourism project plans worth Rs 90 crore with his Union counterpart Vinod Zutshi. On the contrary, state officials kept mum during a video conference with railway minister Suresh Prabhu earlier this month on railway security.  “This has nothing to do with polls. Our CM doesn’t budge on issues where she feels the Centre is intruding upon the state’s jurisdiction,” a Nabanna official said.

The reason behind sending Kumar is to oppose the “one nation, one test” proposal because the state feels such a policy doesn’t go well with the Constitution’s “unity in diversity” model. “We will strongly oppose the proposal since we believe it will be detrimental to the future of our students and expansion policy. There needs to be many more rounds of discussions and the Centre can’t arbitrarily impose their decision on us. We have entrusted Vivek Kumar to put forward our concern and demands,” said higher education minister Partha Chatterjee.  Bengal wants to retain West Bengal Joint Entrance Examination -entry exam for the engineering and technology colleges in the state -against the MHRD proposal. The Centre has plans to conduct a similar test for admission to courses in architecture and hotel management as well. The state higher education secretary may flag the dissent with reference to the disparity in science curriculum between the states, the reservation for students from Bengal and also the language problem often faced by state candidates in case the national level test is held in any language other than Bengali. “Education is in the Concurrent List. The Centre can’t impose its views on states. Instead, the MHRD should consult educationists and take their views into account before arriving at a conclusion,” the minister said. The state is also reportedly reluctant to accept the proposal of single engineering admission test because it is only recently that the West Bengal Joint Entrance Examination Board was revamped and full term appointments to the post of chairman was made. A legislation was also brought in the assembly to give an entity to the WBJEEB.  However, back home, the government wants state universities to follow a common syllabus in undergraduate and postgraduate programme when the academia wants universities to have the elbow room to decide on the syllabus.-  Courtesy

Hyperloop high-speed transport system proposed for 5 Indian routes

The Indian Express | By: Tech Desk |  January 17, 2017  |

LUX Hyperloop Network – Bengaluru-to-Thiruvananthapuram: 736 km in 41 minutes. Connects two major ports in southern India with population centres of Coimbatore and Kochi.

Hyperloop One transport system has been proposed for 5 routes in India among 30 others across the world, showcase on February 28 in Delhi. Hyperloop Oone, the futuristic tube-based high-speed transportation system, has announced 35 teams from all over the world to actualise the potential of the system in different regions – with one of them being India. If the system finds its way to India, we could potentially see distances like Delhi-Mumbai (~1200 kilometers) being covered in less than one hour.  The ‘Hyperloop One Global Challenge’, announced by the company in May 2016, was able to attract 2,600 teams of engineers and planners from across the globe, according to a report from Inverse. The 35 finalist teams were announced on Friday, and will be present at three showcases that will be held by the company in New Delhi on February 28, Washington DC on April 6 and London on April 27.

The company will be inviting government leaders to these showcases, to display the potential of the high-speed system in their individual regions. Nick Earle, who oversees global field operations of Hyperloop One has said the feedback from governments will be determining if Hyperloop One is considered for the region. Among the proposed routes and their feasibility, Hyperloop is potentially looking at five Indian sectors where the system can be built: Delhi-Mumbai, Bangalore-Thiruvananthapuram, Chennai-Bangalore, Mumbai-Chennai and a port connector project. The company has shared a big list of potential routes across the globe. Earle has said that there could be multiple winners going forward, and the company is keeping all options open.

List of all proposed Hyperloop projects under consideration

List of all proposed Hyperloop projects under consideration

Regions that win will then be checked for feasibility before the company moves forward with any projects. “We want to have three routes in production in the next five years,” said Lloyd to Inverse. This means that Hyperloop will be choosing only three systems to build out of the 35 it has projected. The way forward for the vaccum-tube transportation in India could potentially see large hurdles, as with most major infrastructure projects. Land acquisition for building the Hyperloop system and the funding itself will be one of the largest challenges in India. Even though it might sound like a cool concept, the reality of this coming to India might be a little slim at the moment.  Hyperloop is the brainchild of entrepreneur Elon Musk, and was announced by him back in 2013. The system proposes to propel pod-like vehicles through a near-vacuum tube at speeds close to 1200 km/h. It is projected as the fastest way to travel between two places.  “Hyperloop is a new way to move people and things at airline speeds for the price of a bus ticket. It’s on-demand, energy-efficient and safe. Think: broadband for transportation,” the company says on its website. –  Courtesy   /    http://hyperloopindia.in/

Opinion Poll